The summary written by Mr. Salimi was perfectly unbiased, thanks for the statistics. The date and the time have been written right. The problem one can mention is the absence of the participants' names, the only name which has been mentioned is the name of the discussion handler; though the problem would be due to the fact that, he doesn't remember the session well. Another positive point that can be said here is that he didn't use any authorial pronoun such as "I" or "we" both of which make an essay biased. But the problem I see as a reviewer is the lack of any definitions of the word "sexism", he said he couldn't remember the session well whereas he could bring his own definition at least, or a dictionary definition. The style of writing he used was so nice that there is no difficulty in readers' tangibility. I can't hide his great cohesion and coherence in the text, another positive point. In addition to these positive points, the grammar was not so powerful. Two grammatical problems are: 1- Each person said their definition (!) instead of his/her own definition; 2- The discussion handler asked that why (!) without the omission of "that". Apart from the abovementioned grammatical problems, one can call him as an advanced writer, who is aware of his probable problems, the stage which is called self-correction in Standard English writing rules. In conclusion I want to thank Mr. Salimi, I hope my review leads to his English writing improvement.